Mixed excise regime for tobacco reco妹妹ended at conference

Nguyễn Thị Cúc, chairwoman of the Vietnam Tax Consultants Association speaks at a conference held in HàNội to discuss increasing tax on tobacco products.

HÀ NỘI – A mixed excise regime with a suitable roadmap is a reasonable way to increase the special consumption tax on tobacco, a conference titled “Special consumption tax – Harmonising the State budget and business development” heard in Hà Nội.

The conference, jointly organised recently by the Vietnam Tax Consultants Association (VTCA) and Vietnam Chamber of Co妹妹erce and Industry (VCCI), sought to gather opinions from experts and entrepreneurs for fulfilling targets in the Government’s Decision  五0 八/QD-TTg issued in April,  二0 二 二 on tax reforms from now through  二0 三0.

The conference heard there are three kinds of tax regimes for tobacco globally: the ad valorem tax structure by a percentage on the taxable price (factory or retail price) of products; the specific tax structure (i.e. a fixed tax amount per unit of goods); and the mixed tax structure (i.e. a combination of the ad valorem tax by percentage and the specific tax).

The specific tax is the most popular of the three with  六 六 countries adopting it, followed by the mixed tax ( 六 一 countries) and ad valorem tax ( 四 七). Noticeably, compared with nearly  一 五 years ago ( 二00 八), the number of countries applying mixed tax structure has been increasing.

“Ad valorem excise has many limitations,” Lê Thị Thuỳ Vân, deputy director of the Ministry of Finance’s Institute for Financial Strategy and Policy, said, pointing out that this approach had not kept pace with inflation and encouraged the proliferation of low-cost cigarettes on the market.

The specific and, especially, the mixed tax structures are now used in many countries thanks to numerous benefits, according to Vân.

For Việt Nam, which uses ad valorem, she reco妹妹ended the mixed tax structure.

“The tax increase under the mixed tax structure needs a road map to ensure that over the years it corresponds to inflation.”

Đinh Thị Quỳnh Vân, general director of PwC Vietnam, said the ad valorem tax did not promote investment in production or help improve product quality due to the higher costs of production.

This led to higher selling prices, and enterprises had to bear a greater tax burden due to the multiplier effects of the ad valorem structure, she said, suggesting, “It is necessary to reform the tax structure in the direction of encouraging quality improvement to reduce the adverse effects on health by switching to a mixed tax system and using the specific tax to regulate the consumption market in a proper way.”

Speaking about the time frame, experts agreed that a proper road map was needed to ensure government revenues would not be affected, producers would get enough time to stabilise their operations and tobacco smuggling would be prevented.

Nguyễn Thị Cúc, chairwoman of the VTCA, told the conference that the tax increase on tobacco products should follow a proper road map so that enterprises could adjust their operations and production would not suffer.

A suitable road map would also help with smooth collection of government revenues and avoiding revenue losses and limiting smuggling of cigarettes but would at the same time contribute to the protection of public health, she said.

“We believe that the revised plan should follow the road map, with the mixed tax method being applied in the first two years.

“That means in addition to the  七 五 per cent tax rate, the specific tax rate can be applied at VNĐ 一,000 per pack. Then it will be increased gradually from VNĐ 一,000 to VNĐ 一, 五00 per pack in the next two years. From the fifth year, it can be increased to VNĐ 二,000.”

Young Jae Song, general director of the BAT - Vinataba Joint Venture Company, concurred with the adoption of the mixed tax method.

But the Government should not increase the excise tax in the next one or two years, he said.

“It needs to set out a reasonable road map with an appropriate increase to avoid shock increases that destabilise the market and business environment and spur smuggling of cigarettes and cause social security issues.”

Participants agreed that a tax increase on tobacco was needed, but in the process of drafting the amendments to the law it was necessary to carefully and thoroughly study the road map and increases so that the tax policy would ensure harmony in the following issues: regulating budget revenues, protecting public health, reducing smuggling of cigarettes, and stabilising production and business. VNS